A transparent basis
for comparison.
67 dossiers. 66 comparison guides. 305 distinct linked source URLs. Public sources checked 21–29 September 2026.
What this edition does, and what remains unverified
All 66external competitors have a focused primary-source finding, alongside the original dossier. Nagent’s column is read from its published platform, pricing and customer pages, checked on 4 October 2026. Muse is identified as Meta’s consumer personal agent, with its enterprise collaboration scope left unverified. Some official pages did not expose prices; those gaps are visible. 21 players have scoped independent review notes and 49 have public-page screenshots. The remaining reviews and images are not represented as reviewed or captured. No star-rating dataset has been fabricated.
Long comparison guides combine vendor-specific source notes with a reusable, category-specific evaluation framework. Their length is measured, but should not be interpreted as thousands of words of distinct verified facts about each vendor. No paid account, customer implementation or vendor benchmark was independently tested in this pass.
This library is prepared by Nagent and uses Nagent’s brand. Nagent is also one of the compared vendors. That perspective is disclosed: the thesis informs the criteria, while vendor-specific findings and evidence gaps remain visible. This is not an independent analyst certification.
Evidence labels
A source explicitly describes a capability or commercial term. This verifies publication, not effectiveness.
An attributed promise, outcome, security statement or performance assertion requiring supporting evidence.
A reasoned interpretation, proposed pilot or procurement question. It is not a measured product result.
Missing or inaccessible evidence stays unknown. It does not imply the feature or review does not exist.
The six criteria
Shared context
Persistent customer, company and workflow context available across agents and people.
Human–agent collaboration
Review, handoff, co-creation and clear ownership inside the operating flow.
Governance
Identity, policy, permission, audit, evaluation and lifecycle controls.
Bounded autonomy
Ability to plan and act across steps while remaining observable and interruptible.
Learning loop
Feedback, evaluation and outcome data used to improve behavior safely over time.
Growth depth
Native coverage of marketing, sales or CX workflows and measurable outcomes.
An earlier edition carried numerical thesis-fit percentages. They were directional editorial scores with no reproducible benchmark behind them. This edition replaces the headline percentage with evidence, operating role and a practical test. It avoids implying that a model provider is a poor product because it does not ship a finished marketing workflow.
Thesis context and Nagent’s maturity
The Nagent Thesis and State of Agent Governance frame multiplayer work around shared context, human control and lifecycle accountability. They supply the six criteria; vendor-specific findings come from each vendor’s own pages.
Nagent is the multiplayer AI platform for growth teams: agent teams and people in one shared workspace, published plans from$29.99 per month, autonomy from L0 Locked to L4 Fully autonomous earned on approved work, and campaign results published with customer names. SOC 2 Type II and ISO 27001 programmes underway; tenant isolation, RBAC, append-only audit and private VPC available today. Customer figures are vendor-published; the pages say so and invite a reference call.
Pricing and review discipline
Show the billing unit, currency, commitment and inclusions beside every extracted number. Seat prices, workflow credits, generated minutes, cloud consumption and billed outcomes are not equivalent. Quote-required and extraction-limited entries remain explicit.
Reviews require product identity, date and scope. Suite reviews cannot automatically establish the quality of a new agent feature. Vendor-hosted testimonials and award pages remain distinct from independent reviewer experiences. Every dossier includes its review evidence status.